Termination of Contract and the Consequences Thereof

By Divyanshu Sharma

---


A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties. The aim of making a contract is to bind the parties to act in a particular pre-decided manner, which is profitable for both the parties involved. Contracts are legally binding on the parties involved. This means that in case of breach of contract, the party at fault will have to pay the aggrieved party for the loss suffered by it.

However, there are certain situations might arise which might result in termination of the contract. Terminating a contract means legally ending the contract. A contract can be terminated only by the parties involved in making the contract. The situations surrounding the termination of the contract decide whether a party would be liable for damages or not. In this article, the author shall discuss the several reasons that can lead to termination of a contract and what damages can the aggrieved party demand, if a contract has been wrongfully terminated.

 

Impossibility of Performance

Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 provides that an agreement to do an impossible contract is void. However, this is outside the scope of our topic, as such agreements are inherently void and do not require termination by either of the parties. Such contracts are terminated by the law itself, from the beginning.

Section 56 also provides for situations where fulfilling the contract becomes impossible due to the certain surrounding circumstances. Impossibility of performance might happen due to several reasons, like:

·       Destruction of Subject Matter – A contract comes to an end when the subject matter of the contract disappears permanently, or it becomes unreasonable to fulfil the contract. In the first case, the subject matter might get destroyed and the physical completion of the contract becomes impossible. For example, in a contract for renovation, if the house gets burnt down, it becomes impossible to perform the contract. Secondly, there might be situations where completing the contract would not be reasonable, like a contract for repainting a house would be terminated, if the house has been taken over by the government.

·       Commercial Hardship – This reason is not wholly recognized in the Indian Contract law. However, it is applicable when it becomes commercially impossible to fulfil the contract. However, when the performance becomes expensive or costly for one of the parties, the contract would not be terminated. For example, if delay in transfer of goods under a contract would cost double for the supplier, the contract would not be terminated. But if the delay in delivery leads to destruction of the subject matter, due to its perishable nature, the contract can be terminated.

·       Death or Incapacity of Party – This reason especially applies to contracts involving special skills of one of the parties. If the person dies, then the performance of the contract becomes impossible. Thus, the contract is effectively terminated.

·       Government or Legislative Intervention – Sometimes, situations might arise where the government or the legislature might be forced to take steps which would make execution of a contract impossible. This might happen in a war situation, wherein the government will take over some property, under eminent domain, due to which the performance of the contract becomes impossible.

 

Breach of Contract

A contract becomes terminated when either of the parties acts in contravention of the agreed terms of the contract, thereby breaching the contract terms. If an essential term of the contract has been breached or violated, the parties can decide to terminate the contract. For instance, if the owner of a bar hires a singer to perform for three days, but the singer doesn’t come to perform on the second day, the owner can unilaterally terminate the contract by giving a notice to the singer.

There are two types of breach, covered under the Indian Contract Act 1872:

·       Anticipatory Breach – Section 39 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 provides for a situation where a promisor refuses to perform or disables himself/herself to perform the contract, the promisee can be excused from performance. This provides for a situation where a person shows that he/she might not perform his part of the contract, the other party can terminate the contract or carry on with it. But the promisee or the other party has to expressly intimate his/her decision to the promisor.

·       Actual Breach – This refers to a situation where a contract is terminated because one party hasn’t fulfilled his/her obligation under the contract, in its entirety or partially. Such situations put an end to the contract.

 

Prior Agreement

A contract might contain terms which specify what particular actions could lead to the termination of the contract. Such provisions are called Termination Clauses. If either of the parties performs that particular act or omission, then the contract becomes automatically terminated.

 

Damages Arising From Termination of Contract

Once a contract has been terminated, whether damages will be payable for the termination of the contract and the wrongful act done will depend upon the nature of the termination. If the party which terminated the contract had a legitimate reason to do so, no damages can be taken. However, if the contract has been terminated due to the wrongful act of one of the parties, in a situation where the other party had fulfilled his/her obligations, damages would have to be paid. The damages that have to be paid can be liquidated (pre-decided amount) or unliquidated (decided by the Court or the parties on the basis of the loss suffered).

Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 provides that if any party breaches a contract, the party at fault would have to pay necessary damages for the loss or damage suffered. This loss includes future profits which both the parties knew would accrue from the fulfillment of the contract. If the breach of contract forces the aggrieved party to incur any extra expenditure or any loss, the party at fault would have to provide these damages, after the time of termination of contract.

In case a contract gets terminated due to impossibility of performance, the Courts would generally not grant any special damages for the loss suffered. If any amount has been paid before the termination of the contract, the same would have to be returned, on the grounds of equity and natural justice. For instance, if a contract terminates due to the death of the painter, who was supposed to paint a portrait, and an advance of Rs. 20,000 had been given before, the court would order the return of Rs. 20,000 and nothing else.

There might be situations where the contract provides for pre-decided damages in case of breach of contract. In such situations, Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 provides that the party at fault would have to pay the liquidated or decided amount of damages.

 

Conclusion

A contract is generally entered into with the intention of fulfilling all the obligations under the contract. However, situations might arise where performing the contract might become impossible, or one party might intentionally act against the decided terms, or there might be breach of contract. In such cases, the contract comes to an end and is legally terminated. However, when a contract is terminated, damages might have to be paid, depending upon the factors leading to termination. These damages might consist of liquidated or unliquidated damages and might depend on whether the contract was breached. 

 

---

Divyanshu Sharma is a 2nd Year Law student at National Law University, Delhi. An avid researcher, he enjoys reading about several contemporary legal and political issues. He is passionate about the feminist aspect of law and likes to understand law in this direction. His core interests include Constitutional Law and Commercial Law.

No comments:

Post a Comment